Saturday, September 29, 2007

Management Involvement

Having facilitated eight improvement events over the last week I was able to compare the differences between the teams. We were focusing on one group (Medical Secretaries) across two NHS Trusts - so technically the same types of people doing the same time of activity.

In one trust the managers were deeply involved in the process, attending the opening briefs and helping set the scene for the team. They also helped overcome any emotional blockages felt by the team. The teams therefore made leaps forward and improved the service significantly.

In the second, of the four teams involved two were led by an exceptional manager who provided inspirational leadership whilst the other two teams were led by a manager who I only saw in passing - and they did not even arrange for their deputy to attend despite being insisted. As such, two teams achieved great things and two achieved next to nothing - and I bet you cannot guess which two failed to deliver anything!

I cannot believe that organisations invest so much time in organising improvement activities only to see them fall by the wayside because of poor management decisions.

If you would like to find out if your organisation is ready to make a significant improvement in performance drop me a line and I will mail you back a free diagnostic. My email is markeaton(a)amnis-uk.com.

Saturday, September 08, 2007

Helping the drowning man

A colleague and I were working with a group of organisations who are in desperate need of making improvements about 10 days ago. The following is the background to this exercise......

  1. We have been brought in because the main body responsible for these organisations has recognised they need help.
  2. The people who attended were asked to rate how important making improvements their organisation were on a scale of 0-10 (0 being completely unimportant and 10 being the only way of avoiding disaster) and no-one scored below 8.
  3. The team admitted they had tried many things to improve performance in the areas concerned.

Now, putting these three things together should give a really good picture that the lead organisation wanted it, the team felt it was important and it was time to try something different.

However, when we started to try to help them to think differently the resistence grew to a crescendo and in the end they agreed to do nothing (well actually, to commission a report to look into setting up a project that would consider options).

The lead organisation representative was horrified that they had (as a group) agreed to do nothing and that nothing would happen - and we had to reassure her that it is impossible to help a drowning man (or team) if they do not want to be saved.

What do you think?